Case Study: CSTD use in Veterinary Medicine  

Case Study: CSTD use in Veterinary Medicine  

August, 2024

Dogs get cancer at roughly the same rate as humans, with nearly half of dogs over the age of 10 developing cancer.1 Cancer is a common concern in small animals, and as our beloved companions, they deserve the highest standard of care. Recently, there has been a notable rise in the use of antineoplastic chemotherapy within small animal veterinary practice. This trend is primarily driven by a growing awareness among pet owners about tumor diseases, along with significant advancements in diagnostics and therapies for small animal oncology.  

While such therapies were initially carried out by large oncology centers, they are increasingly being offered by specialized small animal clinics.

Safety concerns  

Exposure Risks for Veterinarians and Pet Owners 

The use of cytostatic drugs poses an increased risk of exposure for veterinary staff and pet owners present during chemotherapy.  

Given that the substances involved possess mutagenic, teratogenic, and carcinogenic properties, and that it is difficult to define minimum quantities for these effects, it is crucial to minimize the risk of exposure for both veterinary personnel and pet owners. The risk of exposure on surfaces is further increased considering that most veterinary clinics do not employ primary engineering controls, such as safety cabinets or isolators. 

Research in human medicine indicates that there is no connection between the number of chemotherapy treatments administered at a facility and the degree of exposure risk.2 This means that even facilities performing a relatively small number of chemotherapy treatments must prioritize minimizing exposure risks and implementing suitable protective measures.  

The European College of Internal Medicine for Companion Animals has developed guidelines for the appropriate use of antineoplastic chemotherapeutic agents.  

The compounding of intravenous infusion solutions for antitumor chemotherapy, along with the administration of chemotherapeutic agents, introduces distinct risks of contamination and exposure to cytostatic drugs. Veterinarians encounter significant exposure risks in these processes. 4 Key steps in the process include reconstituting the vial, accurately extracting the substance, and managing the infusion solution.  

Syringe unit with a closed syringe plunger prevents toxic aerosols from escaping.

Risks of Bacterial Contamination   

 Small animals need much less medication than humans, but the medications often come in standard-sized vials, resulting in significant waste. Traditional systems carry a high risk of microbial contamination, making multiple withdrawals unsafe, especially for immunosuppressed patients who are more vulnerable to sepsis. Additionally, many cytostatic drugs are costly, and disposing of unused substances is both expensive and harmful to the environment. 

Use of CSTDs for the Application of Cytostatic Drugs to Small Animals  

Utilizing a closed system transfer device (CSTD) mitigates both environmental and microbial contamination risks, protecting medical personnel and pet owners. 

Currently, only a limited selection of CSTDs are available on the market in small animal oncology.5 EQUASHIELD has undergone extensive testing in human oncology, clinically backed to be safe and easy to use. The use of CSTDs does not exempt the oncologist of the obligation to adhere to current legal regulations governing chemotherapy. Nonetheless, it is strongly advised for veterinarians to prioritize their own safety. 6 

Case Study: Oncology at the Kleintierzentrum Kinzigtal Small Animal Center 

This summary highlights the experiences of Kleintierzentrum Kinzigtal Small Animal Center, written by Dr. Jörg Schäffner, as they transitioned to EQUASHIELD CSTDs. For the complete article, please download here.

At the Kinzigtal Small Animal Center in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, we regularly provide chemotherapy for various tumors, including lymphomas, mastocytomas, and epithelial tumors like prostate and anal sac carcinoma. Treatments often involve intravenous administration of cytostatic drugs such as vincristine, doxorubicin, and carboplatin, with a successful slow infusion method.  

Before the introduction of EQUASHIELD CSTDs, the conventional system left staff vulnerable to exposure. Before application, the calculated volume of a cytostatic drug was drawn from the sealed glass vial. Since multiple doses were often extracted from a single vial, this process introduced a risk of contamination for both the user and the surrounding environment. Another potential source of exposure and contamination arose when air was introduced to equalize the pressure between the vial and the syringe. Finally, there was the risk of needlestick injuries. 

Veterinarian administering cytotoxic drug chemotherapy to small animals

Introducing EQUASHIELD

Over the past year, we have effectively mitigated these risks by utilizing the closed EQUASHIELD system. Administering treatment to restless, unsedated animals requires a safe and user-friendly approach to effectively prevent contamination of medical staff, pet owners, and the surrounding environment. It is crucial for us to have a system that can accommodate the unpredictable movements of the patient, ensuring the safe and hazard-free administration of cytostatic medications. The self-locking vial adapter, which remains firmly connected to a vial once it has been opened, and the syringe unit  connected to the double-membrane closure system thus safely reduces both hazards. The sterilized air is introduced into the drug vial from the sealed chamber in the syringe unit to equalize pressure. 

As the syringe unit is locked to the Luer Lock Adaptor of the infusion system, there is no risk of disconnection and subsequent contamination even if the patient moves. The slow application is carried out in a stress-free and controlled manner. Even when the syringe unit plunger is pulled back, the pressure equalization system reduces the risk of environmental contamination from aerosols. After administering the cytostatic drug and flushing the infusion tubing, the entire system is safely removed and disposed of in designated waste containers. Using CSTDs minimizes the risk of bacterial contamination, allowing us to make multiple withdrawals from the vial while effectively addressing the issue of waste.

 

Veterinarian using EQUASHIELD CSTD

Veterinarian using EQUASHIELD CSTD

Concluding Thoughts

In our experience, the introduction of EQUASHIELD is a significant contribution to safe chemotherapy. Our consistent positive experiences with EQUASHIELD, characterized by intuitive and safe handling, along with significant time savings compared to other systems, validate the findings of a study from North America.7 EQUASHIELD reduces the risk of microbial contamination of opened cytostatic vials.7 For medical staff and pet owners, exposure risks have been effectively reduced.  Implementing EQUASHIELD has significantly improved occupational safety in our veterinary clinic.      

Related Blogs

Implementing CSTDs in Ostlab hospitals in Germany
Sept 2024
#air-tight
#CSTD Administration
#CSTD Preparation
#Head of Pharmacy
#leak-proof

Case Study: Implementing EQUASHIELD CSTDs in German Ostalb Hospitals

August, 2024
#air-tight
#CSTD Administration
#Europe
#Germany
#leak-proof
#Veterinarians

Case Study: CSTD use in Veterinary Medicine  

Hazardous medicine management in the EU CSTDs
August, 2024
#Europe
#hazardous drugs
#Head of Pharmacy
#Oncology Innovation

Trending Towards Safety: Hazardous Medicine Management in the EU

References

  1. German Veterinary Clinic Using CSTDs, American Veterinary Medical Association. (n.d.). Cancer in Pets. Retrieved from https://www.avma.org/resources/pet-owners/petcare/cancer-pets
  2. European College of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Companion Animals (ECVIM-CA): Guidelines for preventing occupational and environmental exposure to cytotoxic drugs in veterinary medicine, (July 2007) Retrieved from www.ecvim
  3. Hergt, F. in Kessler, M.: Small animal oncology (2022): Safe handling of chemotherapeutic agents p. 183.
  4. Kicenuik K, Northrup N, Dawson A, Locke J, Villamil JA, Chretin J, Sfiligoi G, Clifford C, Rosenberg M, Hamilton T, Regan R, Parsons-Doherty M, Mallett C, Philibert J, Impellizeri J, Hofmeister E. Treatment time, ease of use and cost associated with use of Equashield™, PhaSeal® , or no closed system transfer device for administration of cancer chemotherapy to a dog model. Vet Comp Oncol. 2017 Mar;15(1):163-173. doi: 10.1111/vco.12148. Epub 2015 Apr 10. PMID: 25864458.
  5. (Kicenuik, K., et al., 2015) Kopp, B., Schierl, R., Nowak, D.: Evaluation of working practices and surface contamination with antineoplastic drugs in outpatient oncology health care settings. Int.Arch Occup Environ Health, 2013, 86: 47-55.
  6. (Perks, W. et al., 2016) Perks et al, 2016, Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists, PPC 2016 POSTER ABSTRACTS / RÉSUMÉS DES AFFICHES DE LA CPP 2016
  7. Simon,N., Vasseur, M., Pinturaud, M. et al: Effectiveness of a Closed-System Transver Device in reducing surface contamination in a new antineoplastic drug-compounding unit: a prospective controlled, parallel study. PloS One, 2016,11.